“Only one who devotes himself to a cause with his whole strength and soul can be a true master. For this reason, mastery demands all of a person.”
– Albert Einstein
In context, I get it. In total, I’m not sure I buy it.
While 100% on board with the concept of devotion to a cause, I don’t buy that mastery demands all of a person. If that were true, Faith would be the only matter worthy of becoming a Master in.
Why this topic, now?
The Masters Tournament, golf’s grandest show, has been a special week for me since 1986, the year I picked up the game, largely due to the impact of Jack Nicklaus’ victory that year at age 46. This year, I was pulling for an almost 45-year-old Master, Phil Mickelson, who finished second to a 21-year-old Master, Jordan Spieth. If Phil couldn’t win, I wanted Jordan to, so it’s been a good day.
But Nicklaus, Mickelson and Spieth are all good family men. Good friends. Good people with charitable pursuits and strong souls. Their mastery — dominance, if you will — of their game stems in part from the balance of their focus.
A “means to an end” mindset is not a way to develop mastery — but passion and drive, and the ability to share the benefits of the mastery with people we truly love, are.
“Giving it our all” is a noble approach. Giving “all of us” leaves nothing for those we owe some of us to. That’s more than semantics. It’s foundational. And difference makers keep it in context.
Tom Gelin says
Sounds like you are quoting a little bit of the Alchemist, my friend. If the end is the only desire, then mastery can’t take place. Nice post Mr. Heston.
Steve Heston says
Thanks, Tom! Gots to be careful what we’re chasing, in case we catch it, right?